Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone
Yup, it seems good old Vladimir Shaidurov is at it again. This time he's getting published, though most of the big science journal names don't sound as dubious as "Science First Hand". Who am I to complain, though? I found the article at Physorg.com very informative, but on a scale of 1 to 5, only 2.2 on average found it useful. I wonder if that's because a lot of the science community is invested in global warming as real science because they can extort the governments of the world into signing the Kyoto Protocol, thus ensuring their gainful employment? Maybe we'll never know.